Parents trust food manufacturers to produce convenient and nutritious food for their babies. These manufacturers have a legal responsibility to ensure their products are safe, and particularly for this extremely vulnerable part of the population. Unfortunately, recent reports suggest several of the country’s biggest baby food manufacturers may be neglecting their responsibility by knowingly selling products with alarming levels of toxic substances.
In November of 2019, The House of Representatives Economic and Consumer Policy Subcommittee received reports of toxic substances in commercial baby food brands. In response, the Subcommittee asked seven of the country’s largest baby food manufacturers to provide internal documentation and test results related to these reports.
The following companies complied with the Subcommittee’s request by providing their internal policies and test results:
Concerningly, the following companies refused to comply with the Subcommittee’s request altogether:
These companies’ refusal to comply with the request has led to the Subcommittee’s suspicions of extremely high levels of toxic heavy metals in children’s food they sell.
Based on the documents provided by the baby food manufacturers that responded to the Subcommittee’s request, these brands are toxic because they contain significant levels of the following heavy metals:
The levels of toxic heavy metals detected in each company’s baby foods were many times greater than the maximum allowable levels for other food products regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). For example, the FDA has set the maximum allowable levels in bottled water at 10 ppb inorganic arsenic, 5 ppb lead, and 6 ppb cadmium. In comparison, the heavy metals found in Gerber were at levels as high as 90 ppb inorganic arsenic, 48 ppb lead, and 87 ppb cadmium.
Each company set policies for maximum allowable levels for these substances that were much higher than FDA standards for other foods. Reports reveal the companies still sold baby foods that exceeded the heavy metal limits of their own policies.
These shocking results also raise disturbing questions about the baby foods made by the companies that refused to respond (Campbell, Walmart, and Sprout). According to the Subcommittee’s report, current lawmakers are concerned the companies’ refusal to cooperate may be due to “even higher levels of toxic heavy metals.”
Even though toxic heavy metals are known to pose dangerous health risks, especially to children and infants, there is currently no federal standard regulating these substances in baby food. However, even low levels of exposure to toxic heavy metals can result in severe and sometimes permanent health effects in children, such as:
You can take the following proactive steps as you research and re-evaluate your child’s food:
If you believe your child may have suffered developmental injuries or harm due to one of these brands, your family deserves justice and fair compensation.
Contact a toxic baby food mass tort lawyer at the Law Office of Michael J. Gopin in El Paso to learn more about your options in a free initial consultation.
Michael J. Gopin has practiced law in El Paso since 1987. Even after more than 30 years, he still remembers his first jury case. It was two weeks after receiving his license, when he represented a person whose life had been forever changed after being blinded in a work-related incident...